It was 3AM, and something was happening somewhere in the world, there were multiple calls to the White House, but no one had the courage to answer it.
If she wants to take credit for being first lady, she's gonna have to live with the mistakes of the Clinton presidency as well.
Maybe she is a monster. Last I checked Clinton was prez during the Rwandan genocide, so why are people calling Bush out? While the phone was not Hillary's to answer, rent "Blackhawk Down" to find out what happened when Bill answered the call re Somalia. You go in with everybody or nobody, and Rwanda was one hotspot too many for an alliance dealing with the Persian Gulf, the Horn of Africa, and Sarajevo. Why did obama. because he was sending his brother money to help the bombings. Ask the people over there. Senators don't have the red phone.
EDIT: Clinton was president. BILL CLINTON!!! She wasn't the president. Why didn't Bush pick up the red phone for those poor people...... oh yeah, there's no gain there..... no oil. It is really simple. She is a liar. She will say anything she thinks will get her elected. She is power hungry and will never quit until she gets it all. That is not what I want for my president. It wasn't the politically correct thing to do, besides they were black. Monster really doesn't care about blacks except for when they vote. Right, she said when we ran the white house, so she could have. We all know where Bill was at this time as in interns and Hillary must have been covered up from head to toe and she really cares for people right. In the last 5 years has occurred the worse Genocide in the history of the world in Sudan and durfur.
Why hasn't Bush picked up the red phone to help those people. Maybe because they don't have any oil wells. OH, Qadafi's "Islamic USAFrica" requires a whole lot of genocide.
and if you're even minutely informed, you'd know that Obama is all for Christian Genocide and the Islamic African Axis
check out on google: obama odinga farrakhan qadafi wright al Qaeda
OBama would be the WOLF to run the henhouse in AFRICA! Don't blame unrelated people in America, he's got a COUSIN ODINGA whose thugs chop off limbs, burn houses, rape and murder and it's all tied in with imposition of Sharia in Kenya (which is mostly Christian!) as part of the Islamic Axis, which will include annexation of Sudan, Somalia, and more to start with.
And here's Obama out there CAMPAIGNINGFOR ODINGA? WTF is up with that? http://www.freedomsenemies.com/_images/O...
Blaming Hillary or Bush is ridiculous, do some reading then get back to us. They'd have to exterminate Qadafi to get at the root of this.
Did you know Obama's reverend Wright traveled with Louis Farrakhan to VISIT QADAFI? They're all for this! Chicago Trbune She didn't even have a security clearance so she could NOT pick up that phone.
Besides, she was too busy keeping the interns away from Bill. When you see a crying female Hillary supporter, it's because they're sad Bill didn't show up. Please let's not deal with facts-Just good old Republican smear tactics and lies. That's really all it takes according to Senator McClinton to win isn't it?
Is Karl Rove really working for Mrs. Clinton? Democrats wouldn't do anything anyways... besides saying Bush should do something Who cares about Rwanda? For those that say no oil. Go ahead and do a fact check. There is oil there. It is also a civil war, and you don't like the one your in. I think every president makes mistakes. Until we can change our thinking when we elect politicians we will continue to get the same things. Bush has his share of unanswered phone calls also. He is still the worst president we have had in the last 50 years. She was too busy slapping out Bill over his philanderings. (I am reproducing part of a Diary Entry by Mark C. Eades.)
HILLARY'S 3 A.M. PHONE CALL FROM RWANDA
Since Hillary insists on taking credit for the supposed accomplishments of her husband's administration, she should also take responsibility for its failures. High on the list of these is the Clinton's' failure to respond to the 1994 genocide in Rwanda. While 800,000 people were slaughtered in 100 days of killing in Rwanda, neither the most powerful man on earth nor his wife lifted so much as a finger to stop it. The Clintons have claimed that they were unaware of the scope of the killing at the time, but investigations including research of classified documents released since show that the administration was fully aware of what was happening on a daily basis and chose inaction, as detailed by Samantha Power in the Atlantic Monthly, by David Corn in The Nation, and by William Ferroggiaro at George Washington University's National Security Archive, among many others. As Samantha Power writes, these investigations "yield a chilling narrative of self-serving caution and flaccid will - and countless missed opportunities to mitigate a colossal crime." Citing Bill Clinton's 1998 "apology" for his failure to act, in which he stated simply that "we in the United States and the world community did not do as much as we could have and should have done to try to limit what occurred," Power charges that in fact the Clinton administration
"...did much more than fail to send troops. It led a successful effort to remove most of the UN peacekeepers who were already in Rwanda. It aggressively worked to block the subsequent authorization of UN reinforcements. It refused to use its technology to jam radio broadcasts that were a crucial instrument in the coordination and perpetuation of the genocide. And even as, on average, 8,000 Rwandans were being butchered each day, U.S. officials shunned the term 'genocide,' for fear of being obliged to act. The United States in fact did virtually nothing 'to try to limit what occurred.' Indeed, staying out of Rwanda was an explicit U.S. policy objective."
Hillary Clinton's shared responsibility for the refusal of her husband's administration to respond to the genocide in Rwanda is examined by the Sacramento Bee and by Visible Vote '08. As Pauline Park observes in Visible Vote '08, Bill Clinton has claimed that, had Hillary been president, she would have acted more aggressively than he to stop the killing in Rwanda. Woulda, shoulda, coulda: As a First Lady with unprecended influence in her husband's administration, she certainly could have acted, but like her husband chose on the basis of political convenience not to act. Citing a related article by Patrick Healy from the New York Times, and comparing the Rwanda failure with that of the first Clinton health care plan, Park continues:
"Clinton is now running as the candidate with the experience to be president 'on day one.' As Patrick Healy wrote recently in the New York Times, Hillary is attempting to portray herself as 'a full partner to her husband in his administration,' and, she says, all the stronger and more experienced for her 'eight years with a front-row seat on history.' And it is certainly true that Hillary was the first First Lady to get an office in the policy-making West Wing rather than in the ceremonial East Wing, where First Ladies traditionally had their offices. But the First Lady 'did not assert herself on the crises in Somalia, Haiti and Rwanda,' Healy concludes. And the one initiative in which Hillary was given a leading role - health care reform - was a complete and utter failure, so much so that it ushered in 12 years of Republican control of Congress."
Since that time, as we know, Senator Hillary Clinton's own "3 a.m. phone call" came in the form of an up or down vote on the 2002 Iraq war resolution; and as we also know, the senator dropped the ball and voted for war in Iraq, even as 147 of her Democratic colleagues in Congress voted against it. Furthermore, Clinton has admitted that she cast this vote without even bothering to read the 90-page National Security Estimate on Iraq that she and her colleagues were all urged to read before voting. As in the case of Rwanda, Clinton chose political convenience over principle, and simply followed the prevailing political wind in the country at the time. As in the case of Rwanda also, many thousands of lives have been lost as the result of a decision for which Hillary Clinton shares responsibility.
THIS IS NOT WHO I WANT ANSWERING THE PHONE AT 3 A.M.
Mark C. Eades
http://www.mceades.com
I thought these links could be interesting to you also.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-e...
http://www.alternet.org/columnists/story...
KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK, Dead fascist, KEEP ON FIGHTING THE CLINTON MISINFORMATION MACHINE: What would Obama have done? Sprinkle holy water on them the way he does to his fake fainters at his rallies?
"She has done her homework on national security. .. ... She has the big picture. ... .. She is the most qualified in the race to be Commander-in-Chief." - General Wesley Clark
"I think Hillary Clinton is the best person and the best prepared to be Commander-in-Chief." - Admiral William Owens
VOTE HILLARY!
YOU GO GIRL! Why don't we mix apples and oranges and what does that have to do with the price of tea in China? | 
