Why is OBAMA's CORRUPTION not questioned?

" In 2006, it was discovered that Obama was involved in a suspicious real estate deal with an indicted political fundraiser, Antoin 鈥淭ony鈥?Rezko. In 2007, more reports surfaced of deeper and suspicious business and political connections It was reported that just two months after he joined the Senate, Obama purchased $50,000 worth of stock in speculative companies whose major investors were his biggest campaign contributors. One of the companies was a biotech concern that benefited from legislation Obama pushed just two weeks after the senator purchased $5,000 of the company鈥檚 shares. Obama was also nabbed conducting campaign business in his Senate office, a violation of federal law."

http://judicialwatch.org/judicial-watch-...

Obamanites, feel fooled yet?

Well, why did nobody questioned the Bushes' for their business partnerships with the Bin Laden family of Saudi Arabia?. And why nobody questioned the Bushes' for their business meetings with Taliban leaders in 1998 for a prospective oil-pipeline in Afghanistan?.

All of the candidates besides Ron Paul are corrupt and are liars as are most politicians, but Ron Paul is going nowhere, unfortunately.

You actually have the GAUL to talk about shady real estate deals when you support Clinton?

Note: At least you've stopped trashing Bush everyday. Now you have other fish to fry...........lol

Do you get paid by the Clinton Machine?

Because it seems so small and petty compared to the extravaganza of corruption that has been the hallmark of the Clintons for decades.

like that matters these days,,,,,give me more than that,,cause if that's all the GOP has got,,,I'm not even blinking LIKE ROMNEY DID,,haaaa,,,,chow freepress

Show me a human that doesn't have a little something in their background. In comparison to some of the other nasty corruptness that exists this is minuscule.

Not really....but you keep trying buddy....whatever makes you feel better.

No, I don't feel fooled.

Because I want him to be President.

I've read about that. I've also read that Obama was annoyed with himself for associating with this person. More importantly, I still haven't read why any of this matters. Every politician is involved with a group of seedy people, it's whether we consider one group worse than the other that changes our positions on it. I say since everyone is involved in some small forms of corruption, unless they really mean something, they're not worth noting. This has no meaning.

Because Obama is no where near as corrupt as your darling Hillary.

"Why is OBAMA's CORRUPTION not questioned?"

Now you know how all the decent cons are being treated about Hillary.

It's not Obama vs. Hillary with respect to the media holding their tongue.
It happens to all democrats who deceive.